You can watch the ReRuns for $100 million

Dead Cable Walking

Posted March 13, 2019
Share To

A small piece in the Wall Street Journal caught my eye this morning:

CBS Buys Remaining 50% in Pop, a Cable Network, From Lions Gate

It's the kind of story that you would probably not really notice, unless you had stock in CBS or owned a part of Pop, the cable channel, In the interest of full disclosure, I have neither.

To compress an already short story, and to save you the trouble of clicking on the link above, CBS, which already owns half of the cable channel Pop, which I have never heard of, is going to buy. the other 50% for $100 million.

What is Pop?

Pop TV primarily carries reruns of sitcoms and dramas including “House,” “The Goldbergs” and classics such as “Beverly Hills, 90210.” - so says the WSJ.

They also produced the peculiarly named Schitt's Creek, which seems to have something of a cult following,  (I have never seen it, so I cannot judge).


What struck me as odd, or intersting at least, was that In 2018, Pop’s total day audience average was 92,000 viewers, off nearly 10% from 2017 and flat compared with 2014. Among adults 18-49, the average daily audience is 26,000 viewers, a 21% drop from 2017 and a 16% decline from 2014.


Total Day Audience average 92,000.  Total. 

That is not a lot of viewers.

Divide that by 10 or 12 (or maybe even 14 programming hours) and you get anywhere from 9200 viewers to 3833 per hour.  Maybe there's a bit hit at Schitt's Creek?

In any event, how much can you possibly charge an advertiser for access to your 3800 (or even 9200) viewers.

Just by way of comparison, The Andy Griffith Show (since Pop does mostly reruns) Season 5, Show #1 currently has 418,000 views. And that is just one show from season 5,. They all get about the same, more or less.  Some old I Love Lucy shows (since this is CBS), get as many as 3 million views.  

Of course, this does not touch Despacity at 6 billion or so.

Now, I may be dumb, but I cannot understand what CBS is thinking.


Don't they know people are cutting the cable?

Would they not do better plowing their resources into an online play?

(Would they not do better to create an all-user generated digital network - in a world in which average people uplooad 500 hours of video every minute?)

Not that I want to give them any ideas.

Clearly they have their own ideas.

But can someon explain the thinking behind this?



$100 million?


PS: Pop’s prime-time audience last year was 155,000 viewers, a 10% decline from 2017. It was also down 10% in the 18-49 category.


Well, maybe someone at CBS REALLY likes Beverly Hills 90210

But even if they do, you can watch it (or parts of it) on Youtube for free - as opposed to paying $100m

Season 1, part 2 has 648,855 views, and still climbing. 



Recent Posts

Bad News, Good News
June 17, 2024

The old news mantra — if it bleeds, it leads has been replaced by if it’s gross, adios. The prospect of a news-free electorate is terrifying.

The news business is in trouble. In the past decade, more than 2400 local newspapers have closed. NBC Nightly News gets 5 million viewers per night, in a nation of 340 million people, so most people are not watching. What are they watching? Netflix.

For most of human history, people lived in a world without news. The concept simply did not exist. The idea of news is really a 19th-century phenomenon, driven first by newspapers, and then by electronic media which brought us radio, then TV and now the web. Now, it seems, we are headed back to a world without news. Not because the technology is not there, but rather because, increasingly, people are no longer interested in news, at least in the way it is packaged now.

Share Page on: