Dan Rather, Xinhua, AI, Artificial Intelligence, TV News
It was fun, and lucrative, while it lasted

Good Bye Dan Rather

Posted November 09, 2018
Share To

In the 1970's, Richard Leibner and his wife Carol revolutionaized the TV news buisness.

Both were agents with NS Beinstock, a NY based talent agency, and they took up the then unenviable task of representing TV news reporters.

Before the Leibners, TV news reporters were paid, well, what journalists the world over make - which is next to nothing.  

The Leibner's realized the enormous value atteched to TV personalities like Dan Rather and Diane Sawyer, both of whom they represented. So when their contracts came up for renewal, by playing the TV news 'stars' as though they were professional sports stars, they were able to extract salaries in the millions.

And why not?  As the Leibners pointed out, people tuned into the nightly news programs, not so much for the news stories, which were replicted nightly on ABC, NBC and CBS - not a lot of difference there - but rather for the 'personalities'.

Once a network like ABC had built a personality like Ted Koppel, they were terrified that the viewers might folllow the star to a competitor.

Suddenly, people like Matt Lauer were pulling in $30 million a year or more.  

(See Megan Kelly's upcoming lawsuit for her $69 million pay out).

But now, out of China comes word that the goose that laid the golden egg is about to die - a victim of AI or Artificial Intelligence.


It is one thing for robots to take the jobs away from factory workers, or self-driving trucks to mess with the teamsters, but just to show that the technology God plays no favorites, China’s state news agency Xinhua this week introduced the newest members of its newsroom: AI anchors who will report “tirelessly” all day every day, from anywhere in the country.

The prototype runs in both English and Mandarin, but Sogua, the Chinese search engine that developed the technology notes that applications are hardly limited to TV news anchors.  As the tech improves, online assistance, ticket takers, receptionists and even actors in movies may all find themselves replaced by replicants.  And, this being China, no doubt the police.

OK, the anchor here is a bit stiff, but hey, so was Scott Pelley. 


Recent Posts

Bad News, Good News
June 17, 2024

The old news mantra — if it bleeds, it leads has been replaced by if it’s gross, adios. The prospect of a news-free electorate is terrifying.

The news business is in trouble. In the past decade, more than 2400 local newspapers have closed. NBC Nightly News gets 5 million viewers per night, in a nation of 340 million people, so most people are not watching. What are they watching? Netflix.

For most of human history, people lived in a world without news. The concept simply did not exist. The idea of news is really a 19th-century phenomenon, driven first by newspapers, and then by electronic media which brought us radio, then TV and now the web. Now, it seems, we are headed back to a world without news. Not because the technology is not there, but rather because, increasingly, people are no longer interested in news, at least in the way it is packaged now.

Share Page on: