Hollywood Reporter: Russell Crowe's 'Blood Meridian' Deal Falls Apart Over Book Rights Issue

Posted May 16, 2016
Share To


OK, they might not be the MOST exciting video lessons we offer, but sometimes they are the MOST IMPORTANT.

If you haven't cleared the rights or gotten releases, then you don't have ANYTHING!

You would think that in Hollywood, where they spend upwards of $100m to make a movie, they would know that.

Apparently not!

Veteran filmmaker Scott Rudin (No Country for Old Men) apparently forgot to get the film rights to a book before he started shooting!

Plans to make a film adaptation of Cormac McCarthy's Blood Meridian has been shelved because the filmmakers failed to get the proper rights from the book's author and publisher.  The producer at the healm of the production, Scott Rudin, is no stanger to big productions or McCarthy material.  He previously produced the film adaptation of McCarthy's No Country for Old Men.

Tatiana Siegel of The Hollywood Reporter has the story:

The splashy Cannes package Blood Meridian has fallen apart.

Though Russell Crowe had been in talks to star in James Franco's adaptation of Cormac McCarthy’s Blood Meridian, all of the deals are off because the filmmakers didn't have the rights to the novel.

Scott Rudin, who produced another McCarthy adaptation in the Coen brothers' No Country for Old Men, was on board to produce alongside Cassian Elwes and Vince Jolivette. Franco, Tye Sheridan and Vincent D’Onofrio were to have rounded out the cast.

IM Global was set to handle international sales at the upcoming Cannes market, with CAA repping domestic rights. But the project is now being shelved.

Read the full article here.


Recent Posts

Bad News, Good News
June 17, 2024

The old news mantra — if it bleeds, it leads has been replaced by if it’s gross, adios. The prospect of a news-free electorate is terrifying.

The news business is in trouble. In the past decade, more than 2400 local newspapers have closed. NBC Nightly News gets 5 million viewers per night, in a nation of 340 million people, so most people are not watching. What are they watching? Netflix.

For most of human history, people lived in a world without news. The concept simply did not exist. The idea of news is really a 19th-century phenomenon, driven first by newspapers, and then by electronic media which brought us radio, then TV and now the web. Now, it seems, we are headed back to a world without news. Not because the technology is not there, but rather because, increasingly, people are no longer interested in news, at least in the way it is packaged now.

Share Page on: