courtesy Wiki Commons
 

How Black Lives Matter Was Created by iPhones

Posted September 26, 2016
Share To
 
 

Charlotte, North Carolina has been the scene of protests and rioting all this week as a consequence of the police shooting of Keith Lamont Scott last Tuesday.

The shooting, and the subsequent protests made the national news because, among other things, it is part of a national trend (if that is the right term) - a seemingly endless wave of police shooting young black men and having it recorded on video.

Without the last part of that sentence, the rest of the paragraph would cease to exist.  

It is the fact that these events are both recorded on video and then shared via social media (and ultimately picked up by TV) that gives this so much consequence.  But it also bespeaks a fundamental change in the nature of media.  

The time was, and not so long ago, when most police action happened, they happened in the dark - unseen and unknown to anyone - even the police.  And, whatever video we did get, it generally happened by accident.  The Rodney King video which set off the LA riots in 1992 only happened because George Holliday was practicing with his new VHS camcorder and pointed it out the window. Contrast that with the Philando Castille shooting in Minnesota last month in which his girfriend live streamed video of the police shooting Castile - as it happened.

There is a fundamental change happening here, and it is one that is begin driven entirely by the technology.

The ability to 'see' things is new.  For all of our history on this planet, almost everything that happened, happened in the dark.  It was unseen.  When it was seen - and this in itself is a rather novel event, it happened by accident.

In 1963, Dallas dressmaker Abraham Zapruder was trying out his new Bell and Howell 8mm film camera when he happened, entirely by accident, to capture the assasination of President John F. Kennedy. Those few frames, reproduced in Life Magazine, the TV of its era, were seared into the collective consciousness of the nation - a terrible moment frozen in time.

But those were rare. And even when they did occur, and as with both Zapruder and Holliday, entirely by accident, it required the massive machinery of the media companies to distribute them to the world.

Now, all that has changed, and virtually overnight.

Today, everyone who carries an iPhone or a smart phone also carries not only a broadcast video camera but also an edit studio, a graphics package, music tracking and the ability to share or publish or broadcast their video - even live stream - to the rest of the world at the push of a button and at no cost.

This is something significant.

This is something world-changing.

The power of media, which once resided only in the hands of a very few media companies like News Corp or Time/Warner now resides in everyone's hands - quite literally.

My friend, Pat Younge, recently posted this comment in Facebook:

"We laugh but when I made my last trip to the USA with Rebecca Younge and Alex Younge we actually had to have a discussion about what we would do in the event we were pulled over by the police. Can't imagine what that's like as a day to day experience.

Perhaps the answer is, take out and fire up our iPhones.

 


Recent Posts

Bad News, Good News
June 17, 2024

The old news mantra — if it bleeds, it leads has been replaced by if it’s gross, adios. The prospect of a news-free electorate is terrifying.


The news business is in trouble. In the past decade, more than 2400 local newspapers have closed. NBC Nightly News gets 5 million viewers per night, in a nation of 340 million people, so most people are not watching. What are they watching? Netflix.


For most of human history, people lived in a world without news. The concept simply did not exist. The idea of news is really a 19th-century phenomenon, driven first by newspapers, and then by electronic media which brought us radio, then TV and now the web. Now, it seems, we are headed back to a world without news. Not because the technology is not there, but rather because, increasingly, people are no longer interested in news, at least in the way it is packaged now.


Share Page on: