EmailLast Friday, we screened a 40-minute film Lisa has been working on in a movie theater in London for more than 100 people.
We have shot and cut lots of video on smartphones and iPhones before, but that was always for the 'small screen' - computers, phones or even TV. But we had never done anything that was going to be projected on a screen that was 30 feet high.
As with any film or TV production, you never know what the final product is going to look like until it is done. So in this case, we got to the theater a few hours early to 'test' the product.
It was not an editorial test. She had been writing and re-writing and editing for weeks. This was a technical test. Frankly, having done all of this in NY, we had no idea if the images, shot on phones, and done with no lighting, no special rigging, no lenses, no nothing... except the phones, would even hold together.
It is one thing to capture and reproduce an image a few inches across - maybe even 50 inches, but it is quite another to do it on a full sized movie screen.
I have to say that I was absolutely blown away by the quality of the images, as I think was everyone else. It far exceeded even our wildest expectations.
What you are seeing, by the way, is an on-camera segment with Anna Soubry, a Member of Parliament. She shot this herself, on her own phone, and sent us the file.
Look at the quality.
It is absolutely astonishing.
Ironically, this morning I got an email from somenoe who was thinking of attending our next video bootcamp in London (April 3-6).
"How do you feel about shooting video with a phone," he asked.
"Is there any other way to do it?" I responded.
Apparently not.
Not any longer.
iPhones and Smartphones long ago wiped out the need to carry small digital still cameras (and the businesses that made them), iPods or M3P players, portable games, address books, notepads, tape recorders and fire. Why should video cameras not be next?
Featured Courses
Recent Posts
The Uber-ization of Content
May 26, 2023
The world of television before cable had been limited to 3 networks and a handful of local TV stations. But the advent of cable meant that suddenly there were 60, 70 soon to be 100 or more new channels. And all of those channels needed content. But where were they going to get it from? A huge market for content had just opened up.
What TV News Can Learn From Netflix
May 22, 2023
Q: What do TV news and Netflix have in common? A: They both appear on the same screen. They both tell stories.
No News is Bad News
May 15, 2023
This morning, I went out early to buy my copy of the weekend FT — a great newspaper, by the way. I was a bit surprised to see that my regular newsstand, on 6th Avenue and 55th Street, had exactly 3 newspapers for sale — one copy of Baron’s and two copies of The New York Post. That was it. No FT, no NY Times, no Washington Post, no… nothing.