Shooting With The Light L-16

Posted April 15, 2018
Share To

You are looking at a seagull.

This one happened to be perched on top of a small hut on the beach in St. Ives, Cornwall, England.

Seagulls are common birds, but this photograph is rather uncommon.

That's because it was shot with the Light L-16.

The Light is still an experimental camera, and it is not yet ready for video - it only shoots stills, but it will be in video soon.

We are interested in the L-16 because it represents an entirely new concept in photography.  

I have been shooting with a Hasselblad H4D for some time now. The Hasselblad is a great camera, but it is big and heavy. The lenses are enormous and of course, for each focal length, you have to pack and carry a separate lens.  The lenses are also astronomically expensive, thousands and thousands for each lens. The H4D body along costs $40,000.  The H4D gets 40 MPXL resolution, which is impressive.  

What is more impressive is that the Light L-16 gets 59 MPXL resolution, and the camera (and all 16 lenses) costs $1995.

How well does it work?

Here's a more detailed close up from the photo above.

When you take a photo with the L-16, you are actually taking 16 different exposures, 16 different focal lengths, but you are doing it all at the same time. The vast 59 MPXL file encompasses all the data from all 16 lenses and makes them all available to you, all at the same time.

It's still in beta.

It is, I have to admit, a bit hard to figure out.

It's not an Apple product, so it is far from intuitive.

And, as it is so new, you can't find a bunch of explanatory videos on YouTube.

And... it doesn't come with an instruction manual! 

(like I said, beta... but interesting)

to see more reviews of the L-16, to see more reviews of the L-16, check out this link


Recent Posts

Bad News, Good News
June 17, 2024

The old news mantra — if it bleeds, it leads has been replaced by if it’s gross, adios. The prospect of a news-free electorate is terrifying.

The news business is in trouble. In the past decade, more than 2400 local newspapers have closed. NBC Nightly News gets 5 million viewers per night, in a nation of 340 million people, so most people are not watching. What are they watching? Netflix.

For most of human history, people lived in a world without news. The concept simply did not exist. The idea of news is really a 19th-century phenomenon, driven first by newspapers, and then by electronic media which brought us radio, then TV and now the web. Now, it seems, we are headed back to a world without news. Not because the technology is not there, but rather because, increasingly, people are no longer interested in news, at least in the way it is packaged now.

Share Page on: