matt lauer, nbc, today show, television, news, journalism, brian williams, lester holt
You can buy a lot of journalism for $30m

Today Show Ratings Up After Lauer Leaves

Posted December 10, 2017
Share To

Reuters reported on Friday that the ratings for The Today Show, NBC's flagship morning program were actually way up following the departure of former anchor and co-host Matt Lauer.

The show, which averaged 4.1 million viewers in the Lauer era was garnering 4.9 million viewers in the post-Lauer era. This compared to 4.4 million for competitor Good Morning America, who has yet to lose anyone to a sex scandal.

What does this tell us?

For years, Lauer was able to squeeze an astonishing $30 million a year salary from NBC, the theory being that he brought in the numbers.

First, paying someone $30 million a year to essentially sit in a chair and read what someone else has written for you is nothing short of pornographic. Also, when I went to J school, the idea of reading what someone else had written for you and taking credit for it was called plagiarism, but that' another story.

NBC was terrified that the loss of Lauer would devastate the show's ratings. It may have been for this reason that management was willing to tolerate the kind of sexual harassment in the office that apparently everyone knew about but kept silent about as well.

Now it seems that the cat is out of the bag, so to speak, or the anchor is out of the chair, no one cares. The viewers certainly do not seem to care.

The same sort of Star Angst permeated NBC Nightly, the other side of the coin, when pathological liar Brian Williams was also tossed from the Anchor Chair to be replaced by Lester Holt.

Prior to his departure, Williams was getting an eye-watering $13 million a year to also read copy that someone else wrote for him, but in his case, he was only working for 30 minutes a night (or 22 minutes, if you take away the commercial time).

Once again, there was this belief that viewers tuned in to see Brian Williams. It was called NBC Nightly News With Brian Williams.

Hey, do they call it The New York Times With Paul Krugman???

As it turned out, no one really gave a damn about Brian Williams and no on really gave a damn about Matt Lauer.

This whole notion of the Star Journalist, it turns out, is a pile of crap, albeit an expensive pile of crap.

So here's an idea Today Show. As no one seems to care, take Matt Lauer's $30 million a year salary and plow it into hiring, oh, say, 100 of the world's best journalists, at $300,000  a year (isn't that astonishing? Isn't that a lot for a good journalist to earn? Isn't that a LOT of great journalists for The Today Show???)


Peel off $3 million for the next host of The Today Show and only hire 90.

I realize a lot of people will be insulted to be offered the host for the Today Show for a paltry $3m a year.

But I will take it.

Feel better?


Recent Posts

For most of human history, people lived in a world without news. The concept simply did not exist. The idea of news is really a 19th-century phenomenon, driven first by newspapers, and then by electronic media which brought us radio, then TV and now the web. Now, it seems, we are headed back to a world without news. Not because the technology is not there, but rather because, increasingly, people are no longer interested in news, at least in the way it is packaged now.

What TV News Could Be
February 26, 2024

When television was invented in the 1930s, no one knew what TV news was supposed to look like. The medium had never existed before, and so, like Gutenberg half a millennium, prior, the first creators of TV news had to fall back on a medium with which they were familiar, and that was radio.

Maybe scary stories drive ratings… or maybe they don’t.

Share Page on: