EmailI was invited by The BBC to give the opening talk in England on a conference on the impact of live streaming on the news business.
What with the Paris conference on global warming and all, I thought it better to give my talk via Skype from New York. Also, it was about live streaming. And getting up at 5 am beats flying all the way to London to give a talk - at least at my age.
The room was filled with network types and many engineers. That made it all the more interesting.
I have already written here about the impact of live streaming on news. There is no point in repeating it, but you can read it here
In short, live streaming is clearly going to come. Well, it's already here, not only in Skype but in Meerkat and Periscope. There will be a lot more. This is inevitable. And with 3.5 billion smart phones around the world, in 3.5 billion hands, an explosion in live streaming content is pretty inevitable. You don't have to be Nostradamus to call this one.
The question is, what will the networks do with all this live and free material?
Now, here is what amazed me about the conference. While pretty much everyone in the room agreed that this was going to happen - at least in some way - the vast majority of them (though not all, to be fair), kept making the case about how 'their' content was 'superior'.
They, after all, are professionals. The cameras phones will be in the hands of 'amateurs'. The amateurs did not stand a chance against the professionals - so they said.
The defensivenesss was palpable.
And a complete misunderstanding of the implications of the technology - just the kind of misunderstanding that can kill and industry.
The billions of people who will soon start live streaming every event they attend, from concerts to sports events to the Olympics to the front lines of wars ARE your viewers. They are also a billion new and very valid and real content contributors.
They are not your competitors, they are the source of your content - or at least a very big percentage of it.
Note: 100% of the content of Instagram, Facebook, Pinterest, Youtube, eBay, Airbnb, Tripadvisor (need I go on?) is FROM 'average people' and NOT 'professionals'.
There is an enormous, life-changing, industry changing opportunity being offered to the conventional networks - a billion cameras around the world running 24 hours a day covering, well, everything.
You would think that they would jump at the possibility - at the potential.
But all they can see is a competitor and a threat.
"No one will watch their stuff when they can watch 'our' stuff".
'Their stuff' IS 'your stuff', or should be.
The same thing happened to print about 500 years ago, when everyone began writing books.
JK Rowling was not an employee of Bertelsman or The BBC.
She was just an 'average person' with a pencil and a napkin and an idea.
The world is filled with potential video JK Rowlings, and they will soon make themselves visible.
Don't shun them.
Find them, edit them and publish them.
THAT is your future.
Featured Courses
Recent Posts
No News Today — or tomorrow for that matter.
March 26, 2024
For most of human history, people lived in a world without news. The concept simply did not exist. The idea of news is really a 19th-century phenomenon, driven first by newspapers, and then by electronic media which brought us radio, then TV and now the web. Now, it seems, we are headed back to a world without news. Not because the technology is not there, but rather because, increasingly, people are no longer interested in news, at least in the way it is packaged now.
What TV News Could Be
February 26, 2024
When television was invented in the 1930s, no one knew what TV news was supposed to look like. The medium had never existed before, and so, like Gutenberg half a millennium, prior, the first creators of TV news had to fall back on a medium with which they were familiar, and that was radio.
What Is News? What Should it Be?
February 20, 2024
Maybe scary stories drive ratings… or maybe they don’t.